aliser
|
Hi!
It seems that concat function does not work with cord-seq.
I have loaded only Patterns Library but I don’t see it could colide with OM-build-in-function concat. Perhaps I’m wrong?
I am using OM 6.8 for mac. (Yes I know it’s the old version, but I hate to run for updates as long as it works for me.)
Please, can somebody help me out here?
All the best!
Aliser
|
anders
|
Hi Aliser.
There’s no clobbering of anything in OM from the Patterns lib (everything internal is in it’s own package/namespace).
Does concat on two chord-seqs work without the Patterns lib loaded?
What kind of issues do you have with concat vs. chord-seq? If you send us an example patch, screendump, or perhaps try to explain so it’s possible to attempt to reproduce, it might be possible to find bugs or suggest solutions.
-anders
|
aliser
|
Dear Anders,
Thank you very much for answering!
As you said, there is no clobbering of OM/Patterns Lib.
I’ve checked in the source code and found that there is no method in concat function for chord-seq. (There is only for multi-seq, as well as for other containers.)
Hence there is a mistake in function reference (file:///Applications/OM%206.8/resources/reference/concat.html), where it claims that it concatenate also the chord-seqs, but it doesn’t.
Anyway I’ve built my own function that does the job.
Thank you once again for your help and good will!
All the best!
AliĊĦer
|
Jean
|
… it is possible that you are encountering problems that have been fixed in the meantime: OM 6.8 dates back from 2014.
There’s no CONCAT method for chord-seqs, but there exist one for sequence* x sequence* (a sueprclass of chord-seq)
all best
Jean
|
